srf (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Srf, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/srf/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 16 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The Antitumor and Sorafenib-resistant Reversal Effects of Ursolic Acid on Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Targeting ING5."
Article Title: The Antitumor and Sorafenib-resistant Reversal Effects of Ursolic Acid on Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Targeting ING5.
Journal: International journal of biological sciences
doi: 10.7150/ijbs.97720
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. UA abrogated ING5 transcription in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by reducing SRF and YY1 expression and disassociating the SRF-YY1 complex. (A) SRF and YY1 expressions was analyzed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and normal liver tissues using TCGA-LIHC and TCGA-CPTAC data from UALCAN (***P < 0.001). (B) The prognostic significance of SRF and YY1 mRNA expression in HCC was studied using Xiantao (https://www.xiantaozi.com/) (HR, hazard ratio). (C) The correlations among SRF, YY1 and ING5 were assessed by R software. (D) HepG2 cells were exposed to the culture medium containing 2% and 12% FBS for 36 h, respectively (left). HepG2 cells were transfected with SRF siRNA for 24 h following exposure to medium containing 12% FBS for 36 h (middle). HepG2 cells were transfected with YY1 siRNA for 24 h following exposure to the medium containing 12% FBS for 36 h (right). The expression levels of SRF, ING5 and PCNA were determined by western blotting. (E) HepG2 cells were exposed to the culture medium containing 2% and 12% FBS for 36 h. HepG2 cells were transfected with ING5 shRNA, SRF or YY1 siRNA following exposure to the medium containing 12% FBS for 36 h. HepG2 cells were transfected with ING5 overexpression plasmid following exposure to the medium containing 2% FBS for 36 h. CCK-8 assays were performed for assessing the proliferation of HepG2 cells (n=3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). (F) qRT‒PCR assays were performed to assess the expression of ING5 mRNA in HepG2 cells treated with 5 μM UA for 24 h (n=3, *P < 0.05 vs. the control group). (G) HepG2 cells were individually transfected with the pGL3-basic reporter
Techniques Used: Expressing, Software, Transfection, Western Blot, shRNA, Over Expression, Plasmid Preparation, CCK-8 Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. T antigen upregulated ING5 expression by inhibiting ubiquitin-mediated degradation and promoting the T antigen-SRF-YY1-ING5 complex-associated transcription. (A) Mouse primary HCC cells (upper) and Hepa1-6 cells (lower) were treated with CHX (0.5 μg/ml) and subjected to western blot analysis of ING5 expression. (B) Mouse primary HCC cells and Hepa1-6 cells were exposed to MG132 (10 μg/ml) for 6 h, and T antigen and ING5 expression was measured by Western blotting. (C) Cells were treated with MG132 (10 μg/ml) for 6 h, and then ING5 ubiquitination was assessed by Co-IP assays. (D) qRT‒PCR assays were performed to assess ING5 mRNA expression after silencing or overexpressing T antigen. (E) Cells were individually transfected with the pGL3-ING5 containing WT or MUT SRF/YY1 binding site for 36 h, and subjected to a dual-luciferase reporter assay. (F) ChIP assays with anti-SRF, anti-YY1 or anti-T antigen antibodies were used to measure their binding to the promoter of ING5. (G) Co-IP assays with anti-T antigen, anti-SRF, anti-YY1, and anti-ING5 antibodies were conducted to observe their interactions. Data are presented mean ± SD, and Student’s t test was used for significance tests. n.s.=not significant, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001 vs. vector group. WT, wild-type. MUT, mutant. UB, ubiquitin. IP, immunoprecipitation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Western Blot, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Transfection, Binding Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Mutagenesis, Immunoprecipitation
